KT vs
Alternatives
There are many platforms for startups. Here's why Keep Thinking is different: we focus on real validation, not vanity metrics.
The Core Difference
Other platforms measure popularity. We measure quality. Upvotes don't mean your startup is fundable. Expert reviews do.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Keep Thinking | Product Hunt | AngelList | Crunchbase | Y Combinator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert jury reviews | |||||
| Transparent scoring methodology | |||||
| Due diligence reports | |||||
| Free to submit | |||||
| No popularity contest | |||||
| Actionable feedback | |||||
| Investor network access | |||||
| Open to all startups | |||||
| Real credibility signal | |||||
| Community engagement |
Detailed Comparisons
Keep Thinking vs Product Hunt
Product Hunt is great for launching and getting visibility. But upvotes don't equal fundability. KT gives you expert validation that investors actually trust.
- KT:Expert jury reviews with actionable feedback
- PH:Community upvotes (popularity metric)
Keep Thinking vs AngelList
AngelList connects you with investors, but doesn't validate your startup. KT provides the validation that makes your AngelList profile more compelling.
- KT:Validation first, then investor access
- AL:Investor access without validation
Keep Thinking vs Y Combinator
YC is highly selective (1-2% acceptance) and requires equity. KT is open to all startups and doesn't take equity—just provides validation.
- KT:Open access, no equity, pure validation
- YC:Selective program with equity requirement
Keep Thinking vs Crunchbase
Crunchbase is a database. KT is a validation platform. We don't just list companies—we evaluate them with expert reviews.
- KT:Active validation with expert scoring
- CB:Passive company database
Ready for Real Validation?
Skip the popularity contests. Get expert validation that investors trust.
Submit Your Startup